SHIVAKANT PATIL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2600/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010188032026
Filing Number
WPC/10828/2026
Filing Date
06-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/2600/2026
Registration Date
15-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIVAKANT PATIL
Adv. SURAJ PATEL,NITESH SAHU,NITESH SAHU, ,SATISH SURYA..,NITESH SAHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Secretary
-
3.The Manager
Adv. Siddharth Pandey
-
4.The Collector
-
5.The District Marketing Officer
-
6.The Chief Executive Officer
-
7.The Deputy Registrar
-
8.The District Food Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WPC 2600/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Shivakant Patil's petition against the State and cooperative authorities regarding paddy procurement-related disputes. The court directed the respondent authorities to decide the underlying dispute within 30 days while restraining them from taking coercive action against the petitioner society, after noting that replies had already been filed but no final decision reached. The court made no observations on case merits, leaving the final determination to administrative authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
06-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2600/2026
Case Summary: WPC 2600/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of Shivakant Patil's petition against the State and cooperative authorities regarding paddy procurement-related disputes. The court directed the respondent authorities to decide the underlying dispute within 30 days while restraining them from taking coercive action against the petitioner society, after noting that replies had already been filed but no final decision reached. The court made no observations on case merits, leaving the final determination to administrative authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts