Umesh Kumar Prajapati vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2316/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010183612026
Filing Number
WPC/10567/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
WPC/2316/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND ACQUISITION & REQUISITION MATTERS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 504 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Umesh Kumar Prajapati
Adv. A.N.PANDEY,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA, ,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA,AAKANCHA VISHWAKARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Secretary Department of Public Work Department
-
3.The Collector
-
4.The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue)
-
5.Tahsildar
-
6.Executive Engineer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WPC No. 2316/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by directing respondent authorities to consider and decide the petitioner's pending representations (dated 8.6.2012, 18.7.2012, and 6.3.2013) regarding land compensation in accordance with law and after providing due hearing opportunity. The petitioner's 0.404 hectare land was partially acquired in 2012 for a ring road project, but no compensation was paid despite multiple representations, which the court found warranted administrative consideration without expressing any opinion on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2316/2026
Case Summary: WPC No. 2316/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by directing respondent authorities to consider and decide the petitioner's pending representations (dated 8.6.2012, 18.7.2012, and 6.3.2013) regarding land compensation in accordance with law and after providing due hearing opportunity. The petitioner's 0.404 hectare land was partially acquired in 2012 for a ring road project, but no compensation was paid despite multiple representations, which the court found warranted administrative consideration without expressing any opinion on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts