SURESH KUMAR BAGHEL SUDHANSHU UPADHYAY, ,Sharad Mishra vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3945/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010179162026
Filing Number
WPS/10336/2026
Filing Date
01-May-2026
Registration No
WPS/3945/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
PAY SCALES/ INCREMENTS / ALLOWANCES. ( 610 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURESH KUMAR BAGHEL SUDHANSHU UPADHYAY, ,Sharad Mishra
-
2.Devnarayan Chandrakar (Dead)
-
3.Pir Rehman Khan
-
4.Banshi Lal Patel
-
5.Hareram Prajapati (dead)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Secretary,General Administration Department,
-
3.The Secretary,
-
4.The Secretary, Department of Finance
-
5.The Executive Engineer,
-
6.The Executive Engineer Public Works Department,
-
7.The Sub-Divisonal Officer
-
8.The Executive Engineer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF
Summary of WPS No. 3945/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by five petitioners (former daily wage workers whose services were regularized) seeking revision of their pay scale per the 1982 gazette notification. The court directed that if petitioners file fresh representations, the competent authority must consider and decide them in light of the notification within six months, following similar precedent established in an earlier batch of cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru
-
01-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3945/2026
Summary of WPS No. 3945/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by five petitioners (former daily wage workers whose services were regularized) seeking revision of their pay scale per the 1982 gazette notification. The court directed that if petitioners file fresh representations, the competent authority must consider and decide them in light of the notification within six months, following similar precedent established in an earlier batch of cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts