HARINARAYAN DHIRHI vs CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER GENERATION COMPANY LIMITED Advocate - MAYANK CHANDRAKAR — WPS/4304/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010178572026

Filing Number

WPS/10301/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/4304/2026

Registration Date

14-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARINARAYAN DHIRHI

    Adv. PRIYANKA RAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHHATTISGARH STATE POWER GENERATION COMPANY LIMITED Advocate - MAYANK CHANDRAKAR

  2. 2.Managing Director (Production)

  3. 3.General Manager (Finance and Audit)

  4. 4.Manager Pension

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta GuruView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of retired employee Harinarayan Dhirhi's writ petition challenging incorrect pension calculation and a Rs. 2,42,675 deduction by directing the Managing Director to decide his pending representation within 30 days in accordance with law. The court avoided adjudicating the merits, instead directing administrative redressal of the pension and retiral benefits grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/4304/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of retired employee Harinarayan Dhirhi's writ petition challenging incorrect pension calculation and a Rs. 2,42,675 deduction by directing the Managing Director to decide his pending representation within 30 days in accordance with law. The court avoided adjudicating the merits, instead directing administrative redressal of the pension and retiral benefits grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case