TULARAM YADAV vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3870/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010177882026

Filing Number

WPS/10264/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3870/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TULARAM YADAV

    Adv. SATISH GUPTA,SAKSHAM SONI,SAKSHAM SONI, ,SAKSHAM SONI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Engineer in Chief

  3. 3.Chief Engineer

  4. 4.Superintendent Engineer

  5. 5.Executive Engineer

  6. 6.District Treasury Officer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/3870/2026 - Tularam Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh Tularam Yadav, a retired Gang Unskilled Labor employee of Chhattisgarh Public Works Department, sought leave encashment benefits which were denied by the respondents. The High Court disposed of the petition by permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh representation, directing the state to decide the claim within three months in accordance with the precedent set in Faguvaram Patel's identical case, which had been decided in the petitioner's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3870/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/3870/2026 - Tularam Yadav v. State of Chhattisgarh Tularam Yadav, a retired Gang Unskilled Labor employee of Chhattisgarh Public Works Department, sought leave encashment benefits which were denied by the respondents. The High Court disposed of the petition by permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh representation, directing the state to decide the claim within three months in accordance with the precedent set in Faguvaram Patel's identical case, which had been decided in the petitioner's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case