DILIP MANDAL vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2591/2026
Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 16th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010176222026
Filing Number
WPC/10173/2026
Filing Date
29-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPC/2591/2026
Registration Date
15-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS, COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS INCLUDING BANKING ( 21 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO RECOVERY OF DEBTS/BANK LOANS DUE UNDER THE BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. ( 2108 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DILIP MANDAL
Adv. ROSHAN DUBEY,REEMA DUBEY,REEMA DUBEY, ,REEMA DUBEY
-
2.Sangeeta Mandal
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.The Collector,
-
3.Tehsildar,
-
4.Jana Small finance Bank Ltd.
Adv. Ritesh Sharma
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: WPC No. 2591/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioners' request, allowing them to pursue their claims before the Debt Recovery Tribunal instead. The court granted interim protection by restraining Jana Small Finance Bank from taking coercive action against the petitioners until they file their application before the DRT. Key Issue: Petitioners challenged a Collector's order under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets Act, 2002, directing possession of their property be handed to the bank, seeking to quash both that order and a consequential team constitution order for property dispossession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
29-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2591/2026
Case Summary: WPC No. 2591/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioners' request, allowing them to pursue their claims before the Debt Recovery Tribunal instead. The court granted interim protection by restraining Jana Small Finance Bank from taking coercive action against the petitioners until they file their application before the DRT. Key Issue: Petitioners challenged a Collector's order under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets Act, 2002, directing possession of their property be handed to the bank, seeking to quash both that order and a consequential team constitution order for property dispossession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts