YASMIN BANJARA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/660/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010174462026
Filing Number
MCRCA/7374/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRCA/660/2026
Registration Date
29-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.YASMIN BANJARA
Adv. HIMANSHU KUNJAM,Anchal Kumar Matre,Anchal Kumar Matre, ,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,Anchal Kumar Matre,Anchal Kumar Matre
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRCA 660/2026 - Yasmin Banjara v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Yasmin Banjara, accused in a financial fraud case involving duplicate bill vouchers at Shri Ram Transport Company causing ₹32 lakh loss. The court allowed the application considering her gender, clean criminal record, and distinguishable position from co-accused, imposing conditions including court appearance, non-interference with witnesses, and identity verification through Aadhaar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRCA/660/2026
Case Summary: MCRCA 660/2026 - Yasmin Banjara v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Yasmin Banjara, accused in a financial fraud case involving duplicate bill vouchers at Shri Ram Transport Company causing ₹32 lakh loss. The court allowed the application considering her gender, clean criminal record, and distinguishable position from co-accused, imposing conditions including court appearance, non-interference with witnesses, and identity verification through Aadhaar. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts