CHANDKESHWAR PANIGRAHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/2264/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010173172026

Filing Number

WPC/10007/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPC/2264/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDKESHWAR PANIGRAHI

    Adv. ALOK KUMAR DEWANGAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.The Engineer-In Chief,

  3. 3.The Chief Engineer,

  4. 4.The Collector and District Magistrate

  5. 5.The Executive Engineer,

  6. 6.Executive Engineer, P.W.D. (B / R)

  7. 7.Sub Divisional Officer,

  8. 8.Chief General Manager,

    Adv. NAUSHINA AFRIN ALI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

    Case Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Chandkeshwar Panigrahi's writ petition seeking Rs. 10,70,334 in outstanding payment plus 9% interest by applying precedent from WPC No. 5223 of 2024. The court directed respondents 2, 4, and 8 to verify whether petitioner's allotted work was completed and, if so, release undisputed dues within three months, without expressing opinion on case merits. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2264/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of Chandkeshwar Panigrahi's writ petition seeking Rs. 10,70,334 in outstanding payment plus 9% interest by applying precedent from WPC No. 5223 of 2024. The court directed respondents 2, 4, and 8 to verify whether petitioner's allotted work was completed and, if so, release undisputed dues within three months, without expressing opinion on case merits. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case