VIJAY KUMAR SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/4089/2026
Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010172652026
Filing Number
MCRC/7294/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRC/4089/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
Other ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIJAY KUMAR SAHU
Adv. RAJENDRA PATEL,KHILENDRA SAHU,KHILENDRA SAHU, ,ANIRUDDHA SHRIVASTAVA,KHILENDRA SAHU,KHILENDRA SAHU
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Case Summary: MCRC 4089/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Vijay Kumar Sahu, arrested under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly deceiving a major woman by promising marriage and establishing physical relations with her before abandoning her. The court found the victim was a consenting adult in a love relationship whose case arose only after the relationship ended, and the charge-sheet was already filed. Bail was granted on conditions including personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance with court attendance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/4089/2026
Case Summary: MCRC 4089/2026 The Chhattisgarh High Court granted regular bail to Vijay Kumar Sahu, arrested under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly deceiving a major woman by promising marriage and establishing physical relations with her before abandoning her. The court found the victim was a consenting adult in a love relationship whose case arose only after the relationship ended, and the charge-sheet was already filed. Bail was granted on conditions including personal bond with two sureties and strict compliance with court attendance requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts