PARAS RAM SAHU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRCA/667/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010167572026

Filing Number

MCRCA/7077/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCRCA/667/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARAS RAM SAHU

    Adv. B.P.SINGH,Sudhanshu Kumar Singh,Sudhanshu Kumar Singh, ,ADITYA SRIVASTAV,ADITYA SRIVASTAV,ROSHAN SINGH LAMBA,Sudhanshu Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    MCRCA/667/2026 Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Paras Ram Sahu, accused of cheating in a land transaction involving Rs. 43 lakhs, where he allegedly registered property in another's name and issued a dishonored cheque for Rs. 9.5 lakhs. The Court approved bail primarily because co-accused persons received similar relief and a compromise settlement was reached between the complainant and accused regarding payment, with standard bail conditions imposed including personal bond, surety requirement, and court attendance obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRCA/667/2026

casestatus.in Summary

MCRCA/667/2026 Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court granted anticipatory bail to Paras Ram Sahu, accused of cheating in a land transaction involving Rs. 43 lakhs, where he allegedly registered property in another's name and issued a dishonored cheque for Rs. 9.5 lakhs. The Court approved bail primarily because co-accused persons received similar relief and a compromise settlement was reached between the complainant and accused regarding payment, with standard bail conditions imposed including personal bond, surety requirement, and court attendance obligations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case