DEV NARAYAN KASHYAP vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCC/431/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010166132026

Filing Number

MCC/9607/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

MCC/431/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO MODIFICATION AND CLARIFICATION ( 1733 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEV NARAYAN KASHYAP

    Adv. SONIA KULDEEP,BHUPENDRA SINGH,BHUPENDRA SINGH, ,ARPITA TIWARI,DHANESHWAR YADAV,BHUPENDRA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Secretary

  3. 3.Departmental Promotion Committee

  4. 4.Mrs. Rich Sharma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Dev Narayan Kashyap's miscellaneous application to correct an inadvertent error in a prior order (WPS No. 3066 of 2026). The court directed that references to submitting representation before Respondent No. 1 (General Administration Department) be corrected to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 (Forest and Climate Change Department and Departmental Promotion Committee), as these are the appropriate authorities to consider such representations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCC/431/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed Dev Narayan Kashyap's miscellaneous application to correct an inadvertent error in a prior order (WPS No. 3066 of 2026). The court directed that references to submitting representation before Respondent No. 1 (General Administration Department) be corrected to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 (Forest and Climate Change Department and Departmental Promotion Committee), as these are the appropriate authorities to consider such representations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case