PRAVEEN YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/1254/2026
Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
CNR: CGHC010159192026
Filing Number
CRMP/6696/2026
Filing Date
17-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRMP/1254/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAVEEN YADAV
Adv. VIKRAM SINGH VISHWAKARMA,CHITENDRA SINGH,CHITENDRA SINGH, ,KAUSHALYA YADAV,CHITENDRA SINGH
-
2.Lorik Yadav
-
3.Baby Yadav
-
4.Rajesh Kumar Yadav
-
5.Parmila Yadav
-
6.Laibahadur Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Smt. Sindhu Yadav
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-Jun-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: CRMP No. 1254/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the petitioners' plea to quash criminal proceedings in a matrimonial dispute case. Instead, the Court directed mediation and ordered petitioner No.1 (husband) to deposit Rs.1,00,000 with the Court's Mediation Centre within two weeks, to be paid to respondent No.2 (wife). Arrest of petitioners remains stayed pending mediation outcome, with case listed for June 18, 2026; if the deposit is not made, the protective order will be automatically vacated and the petition dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRMP/1254/2026
CASE SUMMARY: CRMP No. 1254/2026 The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the petitioners' plea to quash criminal proceedings in a matrimonial dispute case. Instead, the Court directed mediation and ordered petitioner No.1 (husband) to deposit Rs.1,00,000 with the Court's Mediation Centre within two weeks, to be paid to respondent No.2 (wife). Arrest of petitioners remains stayed pending mediation outcome, with case listed for June 18, 2026; if the deposit is not made, the protective order will be automatically vacated and the petition dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts