RAMSHILA BAI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3184/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 13th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010141392026

Filing Number

WPS/8173/2026

Filing Date

07-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3184/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

13-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMSHILA BAI

    Adv. shobhit koshta,RAJENDRA KUMAR,RAJENDRA KUMAR, ,RAJENDRA KUMAR

  2. 2.Kumari Bai Meshram

  3. 3.Ramkumar Sahu

  4. 4.Sonsir Bai

  5. 5.Sant Ram Gond

  6. 6.Mahesh Kumar Ganjir

  7. 7.Radha Bai

  8. 8.Dukhiya Bai

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Executive Engineer

  3. 3.Sub Divisional Officer ,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the writ petition of eight retired Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees seeking leave encashment benefits that were denied by the state government. The court permitted the petitioners to submit fresh representations and directed the respondents to decide their claims within three months in accordance with the precedent set in Faguvaram Patel case, disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3184/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the writ petition of eight retired Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees seeking leave encashment benefits that were denied by the state government. The court permitted the petitioners to submit fresh representations and directed the respondents to decide their claims within three months in accordance with the precedent set in Faguvaram Patel case, disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case