SHAIMUN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3163/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010139272026

Filing Number

WPS/8050/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3163/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHAIMUN

    Adv. V.K.PANDEY,VIKASH PANDEY,VIKASH PANDEY, ,VIKASH PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Executive Engineer

  3. 3.Divisional Joint Director

  4. 4.Smt. Mariyam begam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to submit a fresh comprehensive representation to the Water Resources Department for consideration of death-cum-retiral dues and family pension within 4 months. The court mandated that the concerned authority decide on the representation expeditiously in accordance with law, after providing hearing to all relevant parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3163/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to submit a fresh comprehensive representation to the Water Resources Department for consideration of death-cum-retiral dues and family pension within 4 months. The court mandated that the concerned authority decide on the representation expeditiously in accordance with law, after providing hearing to all relevant parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case