TOMAN SINGH THAKUR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3247/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010139122026

Filing Number

WPS/8038/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

WPS/3247/2026

Registration Date

10-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

RETIRAL BENEFITS. ( 601 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TOMAN SINGH THAKUR

    Adv. Rupendra Kumar Dewangan,Govind Prasad Dewangan,Govind Prasad Dewangan, ,HEMLATA DEWANGAN,Govind Prasad Dewangan

  2. 2.Ramprasad Sahu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Engineer-in-Chief

  3. 3.Chief Engineer

  4. 4.Executive Engineer

  5. 5.Joint Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the petition by allowing the retired Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees to submit a fresh representation for leave encashment benefits, relying on the precedent set in Faguvaram Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh. The court directed the respondents to consider and decide the representation expeditiously within three months, in accordance with law and the cited judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3247/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court disposed of the petition by allowing the retired Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees to submit a fresh representation for leave encashment benefits, relying on the precedent set in Faguvaram Patel v. State of Chhattisgarh. The court directed the respondents to consider and decide the representation expeditiously within three months, in accordance with law and the cited judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case