NANDKUMAR PRADHAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3237/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010133842026
Filing Number
WPS/7723/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPS/3237/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )
Sub-Category
PAY SCALES/ INCREMENTS / ALLOWANCES. ( 610 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NANDKUMAR PRADHAN
Adv. Chandrasen Chouhan,NASIMUDDIN ANSARI,NASIMUDDIN ANSARI, ,NASIMUDDIN ANSARI
-
2.Lakshman Kumar Miri
-
3.Mahendra Kumar Bareth
-
4.Nimesh Sahu
-
5.Basudev Pradhan
-
6.Pankajni Pradhan
-
7.Sarojinee Garhtiya
-
8.Chandrakanti Pradhan
-
9.Dashrath Sidar
-
10.Raj Kumar Koshle
-
11.Birsingh Sahu
-
12.Raghunath Sidar
-
13.Sumitra Sahu
-
14.Sulochna Sidar
-
15.Saraswati Sidar
-
16.Sukrita Lahare
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.Commissioner Department of Tribal Welfare
-
3.District Collector
-
4.Assistant Commissioner
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a petition by 16 peon-class employees seeking arrears of salary from 2016-2021, which they claimed were due following a 2018 court order granting them a revised pay scale. The court granted the petitioners liberty to file a fresh representation before the competent authority within three weeks, directing the respondent to decide the matter within 45 days, without adjudicating the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPS/3237/2026
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a petition by 16 peon-class employees seeking arrears of salary from 2016-2021, which they claimed were due following a 2018 court order granting them a revised pay scale. The court granted the petitioners liberty to file a fresh representation before the competent authority within three weeks, directing the respondent to decide the matter within 45 days, without adjudicating the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts