LALIT DEWANGAN vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/3278/2026
Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 29th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010132042026
Filing Number
MCRC/5583/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
MCRC/3278/2026
Registration Date
08-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
POCSO Act ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LALIT DEWANGAN
Adv. REKHRAJ BAGHEL,Bharat Lal Sahu,Bharat Lal Sahu, ,Bharat Lal Sahu
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan AgrawalView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Lalit Dewangan, who was arrested for sexually abusing a 12-year-old girl under the pretext of marriage, violating Sections 64(2)(M) and 65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The court denied bail considering the grave nature of the offense, the victim's objection, her minor age, and the applicant's prior criminal history, despite his claim of innocence and lengthy custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Final Disposal/Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/3278/2026
Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the bail application of Lalit Dewangan, who was arrested for sexually abusing a 12-year-old girl under the pretext of marriage, violating Sections 64(2)(M) and 65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 6 of the POCSO Act. The court denied bail considering the grave nature of the offense, the victim's objection, her minor age, and the applicant's prior criminal history, despite his claim of innocence and lengthy custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts