SMT. SAVITA KUMBHKAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPC/1603/2026
Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 16th April 2026.
CNR: CGHC010129682026
Filing Number
WPC/7481/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPC/1603/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES.. ( 1750 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 26-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. SAVITA KUMBHKAR
Adv. Ali Afzaal Mirza,SHAMSUDDIN MIRZA,SHAMSUDDIN MIRZA, ,SURAJ JAISWAL,AHMED AYAAN MIRZA,PRADEEP KUMAR KAUSHIK,Navin Shukla,SMITA JHA,SHAMSUDDIN MIRZA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
-
2.National Medical Commission
Adv. RANBIR SINGH MARHAS
-
3.Chhattisgarh State Medical Council
Adv. DR. SUDEEP AGRAWAL
-
4.Chief Medical and Health Officer
-
5.Issuing Medical Authority
Adv. DSGI
-
6.Dr. Padmja Dubey
-
7.Tukeshwar @ Bunty Kumbhkar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar ChandravanshiView PDF
The writ petition filed by Smt. Savita Kumbhkar against the State of Chhattisgarh, National Medical Commission, and Chhattisgarh State Medical Council was dismissed on 16/04/2026 after the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the case. The court allowed the withdrawal with no objection from the respondents, and all pending interlocutory applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Additional Registrar(j)
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/1603/2026
The writ petition filed by Smt. Savita Kumbhkar against the State of Chhattisgarh, National Medical Commission, and Chhattisgarh State Medical Council was dismissed on 16/04/2026 after the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the case. The court allowed the withdrawal with no objection from the respondents, and all pending interlocutory applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts