ANKIT TIWARI vs THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/910/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010119202026

Filing Number

CRMP/5055/2026

Filing Date

23-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMP/910/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANKIT TIWARI

    Adv. ASHUTOSH PANDEY,A.V.SHRIDHAR,A.V.SHRIDHAR, ,A.V.SHRIDHAR,A.V.SHRIDHAR,A.V.SHRIDHAR

  2. 2.Rakesh Kumar Tiwari

  3. 3.Pushpa Tiwari

  4. 4.Swati Dubey

  5. 5.Suraj Dubey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Jyoti Mishra

    Adv. BHARAT LAL LONIYA,POOJA LONIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed the FIR, charge sheet, cognizance order, and framed charges under Section 498-A/34 IPC against five petitioners in a matrimonial dispute case. The court found that the complaint contained only vague, omnibus allegations of dowry demand (₹50 lakhs and a Honda City car) without specific details of dates, places, or individual roles, and that family members residing separately had been mechanically implicated without prima facie evidence, constituting abuse of judicial process and misuse of Section 498-A. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/910/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chhattisgarh High Court quashed the FIR, charge sheet, cognizance order, and framed charges under Section 498-A/34 IPC against five petitioners in a matrimonial dispute case. The court found that the complaint contained only vague, omnibus allegations of dowry demand (₹50 lakhs and a Honda City car) without specific details of dates, places, or individual roles, and that family members residing separately had been mechanically implicated without prima facie evidence, constituting abuse of judicial process and misuse of Section 498-A. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case