AJAY USARE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/3181/2026

Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010117522026

Filing Number

WPS/6763/2026

Filing Date

20-Mar-2026

Registration No

WPS/3181/2026

Registration Date

08-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

REMOVAL / DISMISSAL / TERMINATION FROM SERVICE. ( 603 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 17-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY USARE

    Adv. PRABHAKAR SINGH CHANDEL,BHUPENDRA SUKUL,BHUPENDRA SUKUL, ,SEEMA SINGH,BHUPENDRA SUKUL,BHUPENDRA SUKUL,BHUPENDRA SUKUL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Development Commissioner

  3. 3.Chief Engineer

  4. 4.Chief Executive Officer

  5. 5.Executive Engineer/Incharge

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Ajay Usare challenging his removal order from service, on the ground that he had an alternate efficacious remedy available through appeal. The petitioner's counsel agreed to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue the appellate remedy under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/3181/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition filed by Ajay Usare challenging his removal order from service, on the ground that he had an alternate efficacious remedy available through appeal. The petitioner's counsel agreed to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue the appellate remedy under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case