Omprakash vs Hemant Kumar Banjara Advocate - A.G., ,AKHILESH KUMAR — SA/584/2017
Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010107982017
Filing Number
SA/25059/2017
Filing Date
18-Sep-2017
Registration No
SA/584/2017
Registration Date
25-Sep-2017
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL MATTERS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
APPEAL FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION ( 1716 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Omprakash
Adv. Anand Kumar Gupta,ABHIJEET MISHRA,ABHIJEET MISHRA, ,Amrita Sharma,RAKESH KUMAR MANIKPURI,MAYA SINGH,MAYA SINGH,SAURABH GUPTA,Anand Kumar Gupta,RAVINDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL,ABHIJEET MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hemant Kumar Banjara Advocate - A.G., ,AKHILESH KUMAR
-
2.State Of Chhattisgarh,
Case History
-
08-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
Case SA/584/2017 Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Omprakash's appeal on two substantial questions of law: whether the lower appellate court erred in setting aside the RCA Mungeli's eviction order, and whether it was justified in holding a suit tenable despite the agreement to sell being unproven. Notice was issued to respondent No.1, the interim order dated 13.10.2017 was made absolute, and the case was listed for hearing after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jan-2018
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
-
24-Nov-2017
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh SamantView PDF
-
24-Nov-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Oct-2017
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Dilip Raosaheb DeshmukhView PDF
-
27-Sep-2017
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Dilip Raosaheb DeshmukhView PDF
-
18-Sep-2017
Case filed
Registration No. SA/584/2017
Case SA/584/2017 Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh admitted Omprakash's appeal on two substantial questions of law: whether the lower appellate court erred in setting aside the RCA Mungeli's eviction order, and whether it was justified in holding a suit tenable despite the agreement to sell being unproven. Notice was issued to respondent No.1, the interim order dated 13.10.2017 was made absolute, and the case was listed for hearing after service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts