MANJIT NIRALA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/2481/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010099332026

Filing Number

MCRC/4263/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

MCRC/2481/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

POCSO Act ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJIT NIRALA

    Adv. VEER VERMA,ANKUSH BORKAR,ANKUSH BORKAR, ,ANKUSH BORKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Manjit Nirala, arrested for offenses including child sexual abuse under POCSO Act and BNS sections, on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety. The court considered that the applicant had been in custody since November 10, 2025, and the trial would take considerable time, outweighing prosecution concerns despite the victim being minor at the time of the alleged incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/2481/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to Manjit Nirala, arrested for offenses including child sexual abuse under POCSO Act and BNS sections, on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety. The court considered that the applicant had been in custody since November 10, 2025, and the trial would take considerable time, outweighing prosecution concerns despite the victim being minor at the time of the alleged incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case