PIYUSH VAISHNAV ABHIPREET BAJPAI, ,CHANDRIKADITYA PANDEY,Virendra Verma,ANURAG BAJPAI,Kanhaiya Ram Yadav vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH — CRMP/805/2026

Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010094882026

Filing Number

CRMP/4082/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

CRMP/805/2026

Registration Date

18-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PIYUSH VAISHNAV ABHIPREET BAJPAI, ,CHANDRIKADITYA PANDEY,Virendra Verma,ANURAG BAJPAI,Kanhaiya Ram Yadav

  2. 2.Smt. Kanti Vaishnav

  3. 3.Lakhan Das Vaishnav

  4. 4.Harish Kumar Vaishnav

  5. 5.Smt. Linima Vaishnav

  6. 6.Smt. Ritu @ Maya Vaishnav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

  2. 2.Smt. Shivani Vaishnav

    Adv. Samir Singh,ARVIND PRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMP/805/2026 Court Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court ALLOWED the petition and QUASHED FIR No. 141/2024, charge-sheet No. 181/2024, and all consequential criminal proceedings against the petitioners under IPC Sections 498-A and 34. Key Reasoning: The court found the allegations were vague, omnibus, and lacked specific details regarding dates, incidents, or individual roles. The complaint contained no corroborating evidence (medical reports, dowry proof, witnesses) and rested solely on the complainant's statements. The court determined no prima facie case under Section 498-A existed, as the allegations failed to disclose specific conduct constituting "cruelty" as legally defined, nor any unlawful dowry demand, and appeared motivated by matrimonial discord rather than genuine grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Motion Hearing Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

  7. 19-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/805/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMP/805/2026 Court Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court ALLOWED the petition and QUASHED FIR No. 141/2024, charge-sheet No. 181/2024, and all consequential criminal proceedings against the petitioners under IPC Sections 498-A and 34. Key Reasoning: The court found the allegations were vague, omnibus, and lacked specific details regarding dates, incidents, or individual roles. The complaint contained no corroborating evidence (medical reports, dowry proof, witnesses) and rested solely on the complainant's statements. The court determined no prima facie case under Section 498-A existed, as the allegations failed to disclose specific conduct constituting "cruelty" as legally defined, nor any unlawful dowry demand, and appeared motivated by matrimonial discord rather than genuine grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case