ANIMESH MISHRA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — CRMP/899/2026

Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010091182026

Filing Number

CRMP/3890/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

CRMP/899/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO QUASHING OF FIR / CHALLAN ( 1446 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIMESH MISHRA

    Adv. ANIKET VERMA,SIDDHIDATRI KASHI,SIDDHIDATRI KASHI, ,Shantam Awasthi,SHASHANK MISHRA

  2. 2.Amitabh Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Ajitabh Mishra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar AgrawalView PDF

    The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a petition seeking to quash FIR No. 0009/2026 as withdrawn, finding that the petition lacked necessary particulars such as specific offences registered against the petitioners, making the relief sought vague and uncertain. The court granted the petitioners liberty to file a fresh petition, subject to depositing Rs. 2,000 as costs to be awarded to a government school for wasting the court's time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/899/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a petition seeking to quash FIR No. 0009/2026 as withdrawn, finding that the petition lacked necessary particulars such as specific offences registered against the petitioners, making the relief sought vague and uncertain. The court granted the petitioners liberty to file a fresh petition, subject to depositing Rs. 2,000 as costs to be awarded to a government school for wasting the court's time. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case