VISHNU YADAV @ RAHUL YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1945/2026
Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
CNR: CGHC010071052026
Filing Number
MCRC/3041/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
MCRC/1945/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )
Sub-Category
POCSO Act ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISHNU YADAV @ RAHUL YADAV
Adv. PRAMOD KUMAR NAVRATNA,YOGESH KUMAR,YOGESH KUMAR, ,Rupendra Kumar Dewangan,Rupendra Kumar Dewangan,Rupendra Kumar Dewangan,Anchal Kumar Matre,PURNCHAND,YOGESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the bail application of a 21-year-old applicant arrested for allegedly luring and abducting a 14-year-old minor girl, citing the victim's age and grave nature of offences under BNS sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 65(1) and POCSO Act sections 4, 6. Though the victim's father gave no objection to bail, the court found the severity of the crime against a minor precluded release. However, the court directed the trial court to expedite proceedings since the applicant had been incarcerated since December 3, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Final Disposal/Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
11-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal
-
26-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar JaiswalView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. MCRC/1945/2026
Summary: The Chhattisgarh High Court rejected the bail application of a 21-year-old applicant arrested for allegedly luring and abducting a 14-year-old minor girl, citing the victim's age and grave nature of offences under BNS sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m), 65(1) and POCSO Act sections 4, 6. Though the victim's father gave no objection to bail, the court found the severity of the crime against a minor precluded release. However, the court directed the trial court to expedite proceedings since the applicant had been incarcerated since December 3, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts