TRILOCHAN YADAV vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — MCRC/1892/2026

Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010061952026

Filing Number

MCRC/2644/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

MCRC/1892/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL MATTERS ( 14 )

Sub-Category

Other ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 22-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TRILOCHAN YADAV

    Adv. Ashutosh Mishra,SATYA PRAKASH NAIK,SATYA PRAKASH NAIK, ,NELSON PANNA,RUPESH SAHU,SATYA PRAKASH NAIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

    The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected Trilochan Yadav's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the applicant and his co-accused father allegedly assaulted the complainant's father, causing grievous injuries including fractured ribs, and that the applicant actively participated by holding the victim during the incident. The court deemed it unfit to grant regular bail considering the serious nature of the allegations and directed the trial court to expedite proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    For Orders [On Office Notes]

    Additional Registrar(j)

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCRC/1892/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected Trilochan Yadav's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the applicant and his co-accused father allegedly assaulted the complainant's father, causing grievous injuries including fractured ribs, and that the applicant actively participated by holding the victim during the incident. The court deemed it unfit to grant regular bail considering the serious nature of the allegations and directed the trial court to expedite proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case