VISHRAM VERMA vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G. — WPS/1148/2025

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: CGHC010046142025

Filing Number

WPS/2650/2025

Filing Date

29-Jan-2025

Registration No

WPS/1148/2025

Registration Date

07-Feb-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE MATTERS ( 6 )

Sub-Category

PAY SCALES/ INCREMENTS / ALLOWANCES. ( 610 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHRAM VERMA

    Adv. PIYUSH BHOI,Anchal Kumar Matre,Anchal Kumar Matre, ,PURNCHAND,PURNCHAND,Anchal Kumar Matre

  2. 2.Shyamlal Netam

  3. 3.Ushabai Yadav

  4. 4.Gauribai Chouhan

  5. 5.Rajkumar Yadav

  6. 6.Bhagchand Markam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G.

  2. 2.Commissioner

  3. 3.Assistant Commissioner

  4. 4.Collector

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem SahuView PDF

    Case Summary: WPS/1148/2025 Six petitioners (including Vishram Verma, Shyamlal Netam, and Ushabai Yadav) sought payment of arrears upon regularization under Work Charge and Contingency Paid Employee Rules and requested consideration of their representations based on work experience. The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition as withdrawn, as petitioners' counsel stated they were not pressing the case on merits but only seeking permission to submit representations to the appropriate authority. The court granted liberty for petitioners to file representations before the concerned Tribal Welfare Department authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF

  4. 12-Feb-2025

    Fresh Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

  5. 29-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPS/1148/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPS/1148/2025 Six petitioners (including Vishram Verma, Shyamlal Netam, and Ushabai Yadav) sought payment of arrears upon regularization under Work Charge and Contingency Paid Employee Rules and requested consideration of their representations based on work experience. The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the petition as withdrawn, as petitioners' counsel stated they were not pressing the case on merits but only seeking permission to submit representations to the appropriate authority. The court granted liberty for petitioners to file representations before the concerned Tribal Welfare Department authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case