MADHU CHANDRAKAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,DSGI — WPC/613/2020
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: CGHC010035732020
Filing Number
WPC/1960/2020
Filing Date
27-Jan-2020
Registration No
WPC/613/2020
Registration Date
10-Feb-2020
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND ACQUISITION & REQUISITION MATTERS ( 5 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS AND MIXED BAG ONES. ( 504 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MADHU CHANDRAKAR
Adv. ANSHUL TIWARI,SHUBHANK TIWARI,SHUBHANK TIWARI, ,MANOJ PARANJPE,VAIBHAV A.GOVERDHAN,Anurag Singh,Prasoon Agrawal,Bharat Sharma,Rashul bhawnani,VAISHALI MAHILONG,SHUBHANK TIWARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH Advocate - A.G., ,DSGI
-
2.Collector
-
3.Land Acquisition Officer/ Prescribed Officer
-
4.National Highway Authority of India
Adv. B.GOPA KUMAR,HIMANSHU PANDEY VAIBHAV P.SHUKLA KRISHNA GOPAL YADAW Jyoti Singh
-
5.Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue)
-
6.National Highway Authority of India
-
7.Tahsildar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
Summary of WPC No. 613/2020 - Madhu Chandrakar v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court partially allowed the petitioner's writ petition, directing the Land Acquisition Officer to provide a hearing to land purchasers (who bought property before acquisition notification) and previous owners to resolve compensation entitlement disputes. However, the court upheld that subsequent purchasers cannot challenge acquisition proceedings and must claim compensation through statutory civil court proceedings under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
23-Apr-2026
Motion Hearing Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
20-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore PrasadView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
18-Feb-2026
For Referral To The Special Mediation Drive-Mediation For The Nation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
-
13-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
13-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh RajputView PDF
-
22-Aug-2025
For Referral To The Special Mediation Drive-Mediation For The Nation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal
-
30-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay AgrawalView PDF
-
24-Jun-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
08-May-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
13-Feb-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan PandeyView PDF
-
27-Apr-2020
Fresh Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
25-Feb-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF
-
25-Feb-2020
For Orders [On Office Notes]
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
-
13-Feb-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam KoshyView PDF
-
13-Feb-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Jan-2020
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/613/2020
Summary of WPC No. 613/2020 - Madhu Chandrakar v. State of Chhattisgarh The Chhattisgarh High Court partially allowed the petitioner's writ petition, directing the Land Acquisition Officer to provide a hearing to land purchasers (who bought property before acquisition notification) and previous owners to resolve compensation entitlement disputes. However, the court upheld that subsequent purchasers cannot challenge acquisition proceedings and must claim compensation through statutory civil court proceedings under Section 3H(4) of the National Highways Act, 1956. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts