NOMURA INVESTMENT AND FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED GARGI GOSWAMI vs OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR — APO /1/2026
Case under Companies Act ,1956 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: WBCHCO0042672025
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
APOT /310/2025
Filing Date
24-11-2025
Registration No
APO /1/2026
Registration Date
24-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
APPEAL SECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NOMURA INVESTMENT AND FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED GARGI GOSWAMI
Respondent(s)
OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
NEW APPLICATIONS
NEW APPLICATIONS
APPEAL FROM ORDER(COMPANY)
APPEAL FROM ORDER(COMPANY)
APPEAL FROM ORDER(COMPANY)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-11-2025 | NEW APPLICATIONS | |
| 24-03-2026 | NEW APPLICATIONS | |
| 27-02-2026 | APPEAL FROM ORDER(COMPANY) | |
| 09-02-2026 | APPEAL FROM ORDER(COMPANY) | |
| 02-02-2026 | APPEAL FROM ORDER(COMPANY) |
Orders
Court Order Summary The High Court at Calcutta refused the interim prayer for stay of a Single Judge's November 2025 judgment that had reversed a 1979 winding-up order of a company. The Court held that the Company Court retained jurisdiction to examine alleged fraudulent misappropriation of company assets by Special Officers appointed in 1991, despite the IBC's applicability, and found no change in circumstances warranting a stay order that was previously denied by the regular bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary The High Court at Calcutta refused the interim prayer for stay of a Single Judge's November 2025 judgment that had reversed a 1979 winding-up order of a company. The Court held that the Company Court retained jurisdiction to examine alleged fraudulent misappropriation of company assets by Special Officers appointed in 1991, despite the IBC's applicability, and found no change in circumstances warranting a stay order that was previously denied by the regular bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts