SALTEE INFRASTRUCTURE LTD LABONY RAY vs M/S DAGA AUTO SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS — RVWO/2/2026

Case under Companies Act ,1956 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: WBCHCO0002062026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

RVWO /2/2026

Filing Date

16-01-2026

Registration No

RVWO /2/2026

Registration Date

16-01-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

APPEAL SECTION

Acts & Sections

Companies Act ,1956 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SALTEE INFRASTRUCTURE LTD LABONY RAY

Respondent(s)

M/S DAGA AUTO SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA

30-01-2026

REVIEW APPLICATION

08-05-2026

TO BE MENTIONED

10-04-2026

REVIEW APPLICATION

20-03-2026

REVIEW APPLICATION

13-03-2026

REVIEW APPLICATION

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA

Summary The High Court at Calcutta heard a review application in the case of Saltee Infrastructure Ltd vs. M/S Daga Auto Services Private Limited and others on May 8, 2026. The court directed the rectification of the cause title by deleting the deceased Prayag Das Daga's name and impleading his heirs and legal representatives, with particulars to be furnished by counsel. After concluding hearing on the review application, the court reserved judgment and refused respondent no. 12's belated request to file an application for transposition/recalling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court at Calcutta heard a review application in the case of Saltee Infrastructure Ltd vs. M/S Daga Auto Services Private Limited and others on May 8, 2026. The court directed the rectification of the cause title by deleting the deceased Prayag Das Daga's name and impleading his heirs and legal representatives, with particulars to be furnished by counsel. After concluding hearing on the review application, the court reserved judgment and refused respondent no. 12's belated request to file an application for transposition/recalling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case