SALTEE INFRASTRUCTURE LTD LABONY RAY vs M/S DAGA AUTO SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS — RVWO/2/2026
Case under Companies Act ,1956 Section NA. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: WBCHCO0002062026
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
RVWO /2/2026
Filing Date
16-01-2026
Registration No
RVWO /2/2026
Registration Date
16-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
APPEAL SECTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SALTEE INFRASTRUCTURE LTD LABONY RAY
Respondent(s)
M/S DAGA AUTO SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
REVIEW APPLICATION
TO BE MENTIONED
REVIEW APPLICATION
REVIEW APPLICATION
REVIEW APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-01-2026 | REVIEW APPLICATION | |
| 08-05-2026 | TO BE MENTIONED | |
| 10-04-2026 | REVIEW APPLICATION | |
| 20-03-2026 | REVIEW APPLICATION | |
| 13-03-2026 | REVIEW APPLICATION |
Orders
Summary The High Court at Calcutta heard a review application in the case of Saltee Infrastructure Ltd vs. M/S Daga Auto Services Private Limited and others on May 8, 2026. The court directed the rectification of the cause title by deleting the deceased Prayag Das Daga's name and impleading his heirs and legal representatives, with particulars to be furnished by counsel. After concluding hearing on the review application, the court reserved judgment and refused respondent no. 12's belated request to file an application for transposition/recalling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court at Calcutta heard a review application in the case of Saltee Infrastructure Ltd vs. M/S Daga Auto Services Private Limited and others on May 8, 2026. The court directed the rectification of the cause title by deleting the deceased Prayag Das Daga's name and impleading his heirs and legal representatives, with particulars to be furnished by counsel. After concluding hearing on the review application, the court reserved judgment and refused respondent no. 12's belated request to file an application for transposition/recalling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts