SUBHASH SARKAR@SUBHASH SARKAR SANDIP GUHA ROY vs THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL — CRM(NDPS)/189/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: WBCHCJ0010932026
Filing Number
CRM(NDPS)/189/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
CRM(NDPS)/189/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP C (CRIMINAL MATTERS) ( 3 )
Sub-Category
Bail/Cancellation of bail ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL SECTION
Last updated 15-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUBHASH SARKAR@SUBHASH SARKAR SANDIP GUHA ROY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
27-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu BasakView PDF
-
27-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu BasakView PDF
Summary: The Calcutta High Court denied bail to Subhash Sarkar in this NDPS drug case, finding serious discrepancies between the case diary (which shows Section 42 compliance) and the deposition. The court adjourned the bail application for two weeks before the next available Circuit Bench to allow the jurisdictional Superintendent of Police time to take appropriate action on these unresolved issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu BasakView PDF
-
25-Mar-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak
-
24-Mar-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak
-
23-Mar-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu BasakView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak
-
17-Mar-2026
Application For Bail
Hon'ble Justice Debangsu Basak
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM(NDPS)/189/2026
Summary: The Calcutta High Court denied bail to Subhash Sarkar in this NDPS drug case, finding serious discrepancies between the case diary (which shows Section 42 compliance) and the deposition. The court adjourned the bail application for two weeks before the next available Circuit Bench to allow the jurisdictional Superintendent of Police time to take appropriate action on these unresolved issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts