KRUSHAN CHANDRA NAYAK ANSHUNATH CHAKRABORTY vs GOBINDA CHARAN PYNE — FAT/561/2025

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 24-Dec-2025

CNR: WBCHCA0591912025

Filing Number

FAT/544/2025

Filing Date

18-Dec-2025

Registration No

FAT/561/2025

Registration Date

18-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 27-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

No Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRUSHAN CHANDRA NAYAK ANSHUNATH CHAKRABORTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOBINDA CHARAN PYNE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

    Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed an appeal challenging an eviction decree, upholding the trial court's judgment. The court found that the plaintiff (respondent) held valid landlord rights over the property through a gift deed from his mother and was entitled to evict the defendant (appellant), who was essentially a trespasser lacking valid tenant status under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997. The appellant was granted 90 days to vacate the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee

  11. 19-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

  12. 19-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

  13. 18-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya,hon'ble Justice Supratim BhattacharyaView PDF

  14. 17-Feb-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  15. 16-Feb-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  16. 12-Feb-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  17. 11-Feb-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  18. 10-Feb-2026

    Application (Civil)

    Hon'ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , Hon'ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

  19. 24-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 18-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAT/561/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed an appeal challenging an eviction decree, upholding the trial court's judgment. The court found that the plaintiff (respondent) held valid landlord rights over the property through a gift deed from his mother and was entitled to evict the defendant (appellant), who was essentially a trespasser lacking valid tenant status under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997. The appellant was granted 90 days to vacate the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case