KRUSHAN CHANDRA NAYAK ANSHUNATH CHAKRABORTY vs GOBINDA CHARAN PYNE — FAT /561/2025
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0591912025
Next Hearing
24th December 2025
Filing Number
FAT /544/2025
Filing Date
18-12-2025
Registration No
FAT /561/2025
Registration Date
18-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
STAMP REPORTER (SR) SECTION
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KRUSHAN CHANDRA NAYAK ANSHUNATH CHAKRABORTY
Respondent(s)
GOBINDA CHARAN PYNE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA , HON'BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
FOR ADMISSION
APPLICATION (CIVIL)
APPLICATION (CIVIL)
APPLICATION (CIVIL)
APPLICATION (CIVIL)
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-12-2025 | FOR ADMISSION | |
| 20-03-2026 | APPLICATION (CIVIL) | |
| 18-03-2026 | APPLICATION (CIVIL) | |
| 17-03-2026 | APPLICATION (CIVIL) | |
| 11-03-2026 | APPLICATION (CIVIL) |
Orders
Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed an appeal challenging an eviction decree, upholding the trial court's judgment. The court found that the plaintiff (respondent) held valid landlord rights over the property through a gift deed from his mother and was entitled to evict the defendant (appellant), who was essentially a trespasser lacking valid tenant status under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997. The appellant was granted 90 days to vacate the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The High Court at Calcutta dismissed an appeal challenging an eviction decree, upholding the trial court's judgment. The court found that the plaintiff (respondent) held valid landlord rights over the property through a gift deed from his mother and was entitled to evict the defendant (appellant), who was essentially a trespasser lacking valid tenant status under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997. The appellant was granted 90 days to vacate the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts