PURABI GHOSH MADHUMITA PATRA vs PRATIMA RANI GHOSH AND ORS. — CO/4442/2025

Case under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1997 Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0590122025

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

CO/4503/2025

Filing Date

17-12-2025

Registration No

CO/4442/2025

Registration Date

17-12-2025

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1997 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

PURABI GHOSH MADHUMITA PATRA

Respondent(s)

PRATIMA RANI GHOSH AND ORS.

Hearing History

22-12-2025

NEW MOTION

16-06-2026

NEW MOTION 1

22-05-2026

UPGRADED MOTION

Orders

22-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE OM NARAYAN RAI

Case Summary: CO 4442/2025 The High Court at Calcutta adjourned the civil revisional petition challenging an August 19, 2025 order from the Presidency Small Causes Court that rejected the petitioner's (Smt. Purabi Ghosh) application under Order 14 Rule 2 CPC and allowed the respondents' application under Section 7(3) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, striking out her defence in an ejectment suit. The matter is listed for further consideration as an "Upgraded Motion" on June 16, 2026, with liberty granted to the petitioner to seek adjournment before the trial court, which the respondents agreed not to oppose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CO 4442/2025 The High Court at Calcutta adjourned the civil revisional petition challenging an August 19, 2025 order from the Presidency Small Causes Court that rejected the petitioner's (Smt. Purabi Ghosh) application under Order 14 Rule 2 CPC and allowed the respondents' application under Section 7(3) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, striking out her defence in an ejectment suit. The matter is listed for further consideration as an "Upgraded Motion" on June 16, 2026, with liberty granted to the petitioner to seek adjournment before the trial court, which the respondents agreed not to oppose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case