SHOUMIK DE A R HAFIZ vs UTSAV DEY AND ANR — CO/3807/2024
Case under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1956 Section N A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0524382024
Next Hearing
18th October 2024
Filing Number
CO/3852/2024
Filing Date
14-10-2024
Registration No
CO/3807/2024
Registration Date
14-10-2024
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHOUMIK DE A R HAFIZ
Respondent(s)
UTSAV DEY AND ANR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY
NEW MOTION
FIXED MATTERS
ASSIGNED MATTERS
ASSIGNED MATTERS
ASSIGNED MATTERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-10-2024 | NEW MOTION |
| 03-02-2026 | FIXED MATTERS |
| 20-01-2026 | ASSIGNED MATTERS |
| 15-01-2026 | ASSIGNED MATTERS |
| 09-01-2026 | ASSIGNED MATTERS |
Orders
Case Summary: CO/3807/2024 The High Court at Calcutta partially allowed Shoumik De's petition challenging the lower courts' rejection of his interim injunction request in a partition suit involving deity properties. While affirming the trial court's finding that De lacked prima facie case (the properties allegedly devolved to different ancestors), Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury granted limited interim protection given the disputed properties belong to deities. The court appointed special officers to investigate who performs daily worship and occupies the properties, remitted the injunction application to the trial court for reconsideration with a 6-week interim restraining order preventing property alienation, and disposed of the appellate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CO/3807/2024 The High Court at Calcutta partially allowed Shoumik De's petition challenging the lower courts' rejection of his interim injunction request in a partition suit involving deity properties. While affirming the trial court's finding that De lacked prima facie case (the properties allegedly devolved to different ancestors), Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury granted limited interim protection given the disputed properties belong to deities. The court appointed special officers to investigate who performs daily worship and occupies the properties, remitted the injunction application to the trial court for reconsideration with a 6-week interim restraining order preventing property alienation, and disposed of the appellate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts