SHOUMIK DE A R HAFIZ vs UTSAV DEY AND ANR — CO/3807/2024

Case under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1956 Section N A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 22nd May 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0524382024

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

18th October 2024

Filing Number

CO/3852/2024

Filing Date

14-10-2024

Registration No

CO/3807/2024

Registration Date

14-10-2024

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Decision Date

22nd May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1956 Section N A

Petitioner(s)

SHOUMIK DE A R HAFIZ

Respondent(s)

UTSAV DEY AND ANR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY

18-10-2024

NEW MOTION

03-02-2026

FIXED MATTERS

20-01-2026

ASSIGNED MATTERS

15-01-2026

ASSIGNED MATTERS

09-01-2026

ASSIGNED MATTERS

Orders

22-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE BISWAROOP CHOWDHURY

Case Summary: CO/3807/2024 The High Court at Calcutta partially allowed Shoumik De's petition challenging the lower courts' rejection of his interim injunction request in a partition suit involving deity properties. While affirming the trial court's finding that De lacked prima facie case (the properties allegedly devolved to different ancestors), Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury granted limited interim protection given the disputed properties belong to deities. The court appointed special officers to investigate who performs daily worship and occupies the properties, remitted the injunction application to the trial court for reconsideration with a 6-week interim restraining order preventing property alienation, and disposed of the appellate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CO/3807/2024 The High Court at Calcutta partially allowed Shoumik De's petition challenging the lower courts' rejection of his interim injunction request in a partition suit involving deity properties. While affirming the trial court's finding that De lacked prima facie case (the properties allegedly devolved to different ancestors), Justice Biswaroop Chowdhury granted limited interim protection given the disputed properties belong to deities. The court appointed special officers to investigate who performs daily worship and occupies the properties, remitted the injunction application to the trial court for reconsideration with a 6-week interim restraining order preventing property alienation, and disposed of the appellate proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case