M/S JAINCO PROJECTS INDIA LTD AHARNISH GHOSH vs UCO BANK AND ORS — CO/3021/2025
Case under Sarfaesi Act ,2002 Section N A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 20th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0387342025
Filing Number
CO/3050/2025
Filing Date
14-Aug-2025
Registration No
CO/3021/2025
Registration Date
14-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 57 )
Judicial Branch
RULE SECTION
Decision Date
20-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S JAINCO PROJECTS INDIA LTD AHARNISH GHOSH
Respondent(s)
-
1.UCO BANK AND ORS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Contested Application
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
20-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Calcutta dismissed Jainco Projects' petition challenging the DRAT's July 2025 order requiring 50% pre-deposit of ₹4.95 crore debt under SARFAESI Act Section 18(1). The court held that the DRT's March 2025 order rejecting the borrower's plea for bank implementation of its One-Time Settlement (OTS) scheme was substantive, not procedural, and therefore pre-deposit was mandatory for appeals before DRAT. The court upheld settled law that borrowers must deposit 50% debt or face appeal dismissal, with DRAT only authorized to reduce it minimally to 25%. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-May-2026
Contested Application
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Contested Application
Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai
-
26-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Justice Hiranmay BhattacharyyaView PDF
-
26-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CO/3021/2025
Summary: The High Court of Calcutta dismissed Jainco Projects' petition challenging the DRAT's July 2025 order requiring 50% pre-deposit of ₹4.95 crore debt under SARFAESI Act Section 18(1). The court held that the DRT's March 2025 order rejecting the borrower's plea for bank implementation of its One-Time Settlement (OTS) scheme was substantive, not procedural, and therefore pre-deposit was mandatory for appeals before DRAT. The court upheld settled law that borrowers must deposit 50% debt or face appeal dismissal, with DRAT only authorized to reduce it minimally to 25%. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts