SUROJIT DUTTA AND ORS. ATREYA CHAKRABORTY vs MILAN KANTI GUHA ROY — CO/1421/2026

Case under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1956 Section NA. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

CNR: WBCHCA0185622026

Filing Number

CO/1383/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

CO/1421/2026

Registration Date

22-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP B (CIVIL MATTERS) ( 2 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 57 )

Judicial Branch

RULE SECTION

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act ,1956 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUROJIT DUTTA AND ORS. ATREYA CHAKRABORTY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MILAN KANTI GUHA ROY

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan RaiView PDF

    Case Summary: CO/1421/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to June 10, 2026 for next hearing as "New Motion." Petitioners Surojit Dutta & Ors. challenged the trial court's February 2, 2026 order allowing tenant Milan Kanti Guha Roy's Section 7(1) application under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, claiming the tenant failed to comply with statutory deposit requirements within the prescribed timeframe. Court directed petitioners to serve the respondent with notice for the scheduled hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    New Motion

    Hon'ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CO/1421/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CO/1421/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to June 10, 2026 for next hearing as "New Motion." Petitioners Surojit Dutta & Ors. challenged the trial court's February 2, 2026 order allowing tenant Milan Kanti Guha Roy's Section 7(1) application under West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, claiming the tenant failed to comply with statutory deposit requirements within the prescribed timeframe. Court directed petitioners to serve the respondent with notice for the scheduled hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case