SAIBAL GHOSH DASTIDAR SUSMITA DEY (BASU) vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. — WPA/7399/2026
Case under Road Transport Corporations Act ,1950 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0141862026
Filing Number
WPA/7239/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
WPA/7399/2026
Registration Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAIBAL GHOSH DASTIDAR SUSMITA DEY (BASU)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF
The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by retired CSTC employee Saibal Ghosh Dastidar claiming unpaid leave encashment. The court held that the petitioner should have first filed a representation before CSTC authority instead of directly approaching the court, and granted liberty to file such representation, which the authority must consider and decide with a reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
30-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
28-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
27-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
24-Apr-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
23-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/7399/2026
The Calcutta High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by retired CSTC employee Saibal Ghosh Dastidar claiming unpaid leave encashment. The court held that the petitioner should have first filed a representation before CSTC authority instead of directly approaching the court, and granted liberty to file such representation, which the authority must consider and decide with a reasoned order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts