BAJETA CHETTRI RATIKANTA PAL vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA/6249/2026

Case under Central Industrial Security Force Act Section NA. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: WBCHCA0122962026

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

WPA/6203/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

WPA/6249/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

PENALTY ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Acts & Sections

Central Industrial Security Force Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

BAJETA CHETTRI RATIKANTA PAL

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

17-03-2026

NEW MOTION

06-05-2026

MOTION

04-05-2026

MOTION

30-04-2026

MOTION

06-04-2026

MOTION

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Case Summary: WPA 6249/2026 Bijeta Chettri v. Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court adjourned the writ petition challenging a disciplinary order against the petitioner (affirmed at three administrative levels) for further hearing on exchange of affidavits. The respondents must file affidavit-in-opposition within 8 weeks with 3-week reply period. The Court denied the petitioner's interim relief request to restrain vacation of her official accommodation, citing her previous losses at the disciplinary, appellate, and revisional authority levels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WPA 6249/2026 Bijeta Chettri v. Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court adjourned the writ petition challenging a disciplinary order against the petitioner (affirmed at three administrative levels) for further hearing on exchange of affidavits. The respondents must file affidavit-in-opposition within 8 weeks with 3-week reply period. The Court denied the petitioner's interim relief request to restrain vacation of her official accommodation, citing her previous losses at the disciplinary, appellate, and revisional authority levels. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case