SHYAMALI DAS SUKUL BENAZIR SHAIKH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA/4415/2026
Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: WBCHCA0084962026
Filing Number
WPA/4239/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
WPA/4415/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )
Sub-Category
Miscellaneous ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
MANDAMUS SECTION
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHYAMALI DAS SUKUL BENAZIR SHAIKH
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
-
2.THE MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL
-
3.THE SECRETARY CHIEF MINISTER
-
4.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (HQ)
-
5.THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
-
6.THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL AT TREASURY BUILDINGS
-
7.DEBENDRA SUKUL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Amrita SinhaView PDF
Summary: The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Shyamali Das Sukul, who sought directions to record her name as nominee in her retired IPS officer husband's service records. The court held it lacked jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution because the matter involved a Central Government employee, which falls outside the High Court's purview as a court of first instance. The petitioner was directed to approach the competent forum for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
02-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Amrita Sinha
-
02-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
01-Mar-2026
New Motion
Hon'ble Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPA/4415/2026
Summary: The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Shyamali Das Sukul, who sought directions to record her name as nominee in her retired IPS officer husband's service records. The court held it lacked jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution because the matter involved a Central Government employee, which falls outside the High Court's purview as a court of first instance. The petitioner was directed to approach the competent forum for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts