SHYAMALI DAS SUKUL BENAZIR SHAIKH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. — WPA /4415/2026

Case under No Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.

CNR: WBCHCA0084962026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

27th February 2026

Filing Number

WPA /4239/2026

Filing Date

19-02-2026

Registration No

WPA /4415/2026

Registration Date

20-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

GROUP A (WRIT MATTERS) ( 1 )

Sub-Category

Miscellaneous ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

MANDAMUS SECTION

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

NO ACT Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SHYAMALI DAS SUKUL BENAZIR SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

THE MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL

THE SECRETARY CHIEF MINISTER

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (HQ)

THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL AT TREASURY BUILDINGS

DEBENDRA SUKUL

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

27-02-2026

NEW MOTION

23-03-2026

MOTION

01-03-2026

NEW MOTION

02-03-2026

NEW MOTION

02-03-2026

NEW MOTION

Orders

23-03-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA

Summary: The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Shyamali Das Sukul, who sought directions to record her name as nominee in her retired IPS officer husband's service records. The court held it lacked jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution because the matter involved a Central Government employee, which falls outside the High Court's purview as a court of first instance. The petitioner was directed to approach the competent forum for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Calcutta High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Shyamali Das Sukul, who sought directions to record her name as nominee in her retired IPS officer husband's service records. The court held it lacked jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution because the matter involved a Central Government employee, which falls outside the High Court's purview as a court of first instance. The petitioner was directed to approach the competent forum for relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case