VAIBHAV JAIN vs LUIZA THOMAS FERNANDES AND 7 ORS — AO/2/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.

Next hearing 02-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM050024532023

Filing Number

AO/1844/2023

Filing Date

18-Aug-2023

Registration No

AO/2/2024

Registration Date

06-Jan-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

JUDICIAL SECTION

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 43

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VAIBHAV JAIN

    Adv. P. P. SINGH,GOVIND BHOBE,GOVIND BHOBE, DEVENDRA BHARADWAJ,GOVIND BHOBE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LUIZA THOMAS FERNANDES AND 7 ORS

  2. 2.DORETHY MARSHAL FERNANDES

  3. 3.CARMELINA FERNANDES

  4. 4.VALENTINE STEVEN FERNANDES

  5. 5.MARIA FERNANDES E CARDOSO

  6. 6.JOSE FERRO MARTINS DESA @ JOSE D'SA

  7. 7.ALFRED MARSHAL RODRIGUES

  8. 8.ATMARAM S. DESAI

Case History

  1. 02-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    For Admission - Fresh

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki Menezes

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Valmiki MenezesView PDF

    Case Summary: In this High Court of Bombay at Goa appeal, Vaibhav Jain challenged an order refusing to restrain defendants from creating third-party rights over the suit property. The case was adjourned to 02.07.2026 to await the trial court's decision on impleading the third party, who had acquired the property during the appeal's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 01-Dec-2023

    RegistrarView PDF

  6. 27-Oct-2023

    RegistrarView PDF

  7. 18-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. AO/2/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In this High Court of Bombay at Goa appeal, Vaibhav Jain challenged an order refusing to restrain defendants from creating third-party rights over the suit property. The case was adjourned to 02.07.2026 to await the trial court's decision on impleading the third party, who had acquired the property during the appeal's pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case