DR. BHUPENDRAKUMAR KESHAVRAO WASNIK BHUPENDRAKUMAR WASNIK vs COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. Advocate - GIRISH A. KUNTE, (FOR R — WP/4674/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 17th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040175802026
Filing Number
WP/11970/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/4674/2026
Registration Date
16-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DR. BHUPENDRAKUMAR KESHAVRAO WASNIK BHUPENDRAKUMAR WASNIK
Respondent(s)
-
1.COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. Advocate - GIRISH A. KUNTE, (FOR R
-
2.DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES NAGPUR
-
3.CHAIRMAN NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST, NAGPUR
-
4.SECRETARY THE DEPRESSED CLASSES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, NAGPUR
-
5.KAMLESH CHARANDAS LOKHANDE
-
6.RAJENDRA SAJAN NIKOSE
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Jun-2026
—
-
17-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Case Summary: WP/4674/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition by directing the Nagpur Municipal Corporation and Nagpur Improvement Trust to treat the petitioner's grievances as a formal representation and decide them on merits within eight weeks after affording all parties an opportunity to be heard. The court found the disputes regarding sewerage access, plot maintenance, commercial use violations, and society bylaws enforcement were more appropriately handled by administrative authorities rather than through writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4674/2026
Case Summary: WP/4674/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition by directing the Nagpur Municipal Corporation and Nagpur Improvement Trust to treat the petitioner's grievances as a formal representation and decide them on merits within eight weeks after affording all parties an opportunity to be heard. The court found the disputes regarding sewerage access, plot maintenance, commercial use violations, and society bylaws enforcement were more appropriately handled by administrative authorities rather than through writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts