DEVIDAS PRALHAD SARSAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER — WP/5725/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040172242024

Filing Number

WP/12154/2024

Filing Date

27-Jun-2024

Registration No

WP/5725/2024

Registration Date

25-Sep-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 26-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Municipal Corporations (Amendment) Act (Maharashtra)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVIDAS PRALHAD SARSAR

    Adv. Y. B. SONONE,DATTARAM N. MUDGALE,DATTARAM N. MUDGALE, ,DIKSHA MAHADEO ROHANKAR,DATTARAM N. MUDGALE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER

    Adv. ,JEMINI BRIJMOHAN KASAT 1123

  2. 2.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AMRAVATI THR. COMMISSIONER

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    For Admission-Service Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

    In WP 5725/2024, the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard arguments on 15th April 2026. Respondent No. 2's counsel argued that an alternate remedy exists under the Industrial Court via the MRTU and PULP Act (Item 9, Schedule IV), which could address the petitioner's claims as unfair labour practice. The petitioner's counsel requested time to present binding precedents on this issue. The case was adjourned to 17th June 2026 for further arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    For Admission - Circulated Matters (Civil Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    For Admission - Circulated Matters (Civil Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar , Hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao Deshpande

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice M. S. Jawalkar,hon'ble Shri Justice Nandesh Shankarrao DeshpandeView PDF

  8. 27-Mar-2025

    For Admission -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  9. 12-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  10. 12-Mar-2025

    For Admission - (Civil Side Matters)

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. Gharote

  11. 26-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Avinash G. GharoteView PDF

  12. 11-Oct-2024

    Registrar (Judicial)

  13. 10-Oct-2024

    Fresh Admission (Civil Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish Dangre , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  14. 30-Sep-2024

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Harish Dangre,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  15. 02-Sep-2024

    For Orders -

    Registrar (Judicial)

  16. 19-Aug-2024

    Registrar (Judicial)View PDF

  17. 19-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 27-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5725/2024

casestatus.in Summary

In WP 5725/2024, the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard arguments on 15th April 2026. Respondent No. 2's counsel argued that an alternate remedy exists under the Industrial Court via the MRTU and PULP Act (Item 9, Schedule IV), which could address the petitioner's claims as unfair labour practice. The petitioner's counsel requested time to present binding precedents on this issue. The case was adjourned to 17th June 2026 for further arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case