THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THE COMMISSIONER SPORTS AND YOUTH SERVICES PUNE AND OTHERS vs DNYANESHWAR S/O PRAKASH TALE Advocate - PRATIK JAYANT MEHTA, (FOR RESPONDENT) — WP/2527/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040099282026

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/6786/2026

Filing Date

18-03-2026

Registration No

WP/2527/2026

Registration Date

25-03-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section ---
Mah. Civil Services Pension Rules Section ---

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THE COMMISSIONER SPORTS AND YOUTH SERVICES PUNE AND OTHERS

Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

THE PRESIDENT TALUKA SPORT SANKUL SAMITEE MEHKAR BULDHANA

THE SECRETARY TALUKA SPORTS SANKUL SAMITEE MEHKAR, BULDHANA

THE DISTRICT SPORTS OFFICER BULDHANA

Respondent(s)

DNYANESHWAR S/O PRAKASH TALE Advocate - PRATIK JAYANT MEHTA, (FOR RESPONDENT)

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

14-04-2026
15-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION-LABOUR AND INDUSTRIAL

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) adjourned the writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's regularization order of respondent Dnyaneshwar Tale. The court issued notice to the respondent returnable after four weeks and granted interim relief by restraining coercive action against the petitioners (State) until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) adjourned the writ petition challenging the Industrial Court's regularization order of respondent Dnyaneshwar Tale. The court issued notice to the respondent returnable after four weeks and granted interim relief by restraining coercive action against the petitioners (State) until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case