VINOD DATTATRAYA AMBEKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/322/2020
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM030518542019
Next Hearing
13th January 2020
Filing Number
WP/40124/2019
Filing Date
17-12-2019
Registration No
WP/322/2020
Registration Date
07-01-2020
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Bench Type
Single
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VINOD DATTATRAYA AMBEKAR
Adv. Nitin V Gaware Patil
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Adv. NO CAVEAT,AGP FOR R.NO. 1 TO 5,Gaike R.S. 1123
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-02-2020 | AWAIT NOTICES CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 13-01-2020 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 20-03-2020 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
| 08-06-2020 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Writ Petitions No. 322 and 501 of 2020 as infructuous on April 1, 2026. Both petitioner Vinod Dattatraya Ambekar's counsel and respondents' counsel agreed that due to passage of time, the matters had lost their live character and become moot, warranting dismissal without adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of Writ Petitions No. 322 and 501 of 2020 as infructuous on April 1, 2026. Both petitioner Vinod Dattatraya Ambekar's counsel and respondents' counsel agreed that due to passage of time, the matters had lost their live character and become moot, warranting dismissal without adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts