MAULANA MOHAMMAD ALI JOHAR EDUCATION SOCIETY THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT AND OTHERS vs SURAJPRASAD PRALHAD JAISWAL AND ANOTHER Advocate - BONDAR UTTAM BAJIRAO — CP/822/2018

Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030418542018

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

27th November 2018

Filing Number

CP/33044/2018

Filing Date

24-10-2018

Registration No

CP/822/2018

Registration Date

19-11-2018

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India
Maharashtra Public Trusts Act 1950

Petitioner(s)

MAULANA MOHAMMAD ALI JOHAR EDUCATION SOCIETY THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT AND OTHERS

Adv. Bajaj Anil S.

Respondent(s)

SURAJPRASAD PRALHAD JAISWAL AND ANOTHER Advocate - BONDAR UTTAM BAJIRAO

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

27-11-2018

URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL

03-03-2020

PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Maulana Mohammad Ali Johar Education Society against Surajprasad Pralhad Jaiswal. The court found that the underlying proposal for grant of approval had been resolved by passage of time, rendering the contempt petition moot, and accordingly disposed of the matter without further adjudication on the contempt merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Maulana Mohammad Ali Johar Education Society against Surajprasad Pralhad Jaiswal. The court found that the underlying proposal for grant of approval had been resolved by passage of time, rendering the contempt petition moot, and accordingly disposed of the matter without further adjudication on the contempt merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case