MAULANA MOHAMMAD ALI JOHAR EDUCATION SOCIETY THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT AND OTHERS vs SURAJPRASAD PRALHAD JAISWAL AND ANOTHER Advocate - BONDAR UTTAM BAJIRAO — CP/822/2018
Case under Constitution of India. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030418542018
Filing Number
CP/33044/2018
Filing Date
24-Oct-2018
Registration No
CP/822/2018
Registration Date
19-Nov-2018
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAULANA MOHAMMAD ALI JOHAR EDUCATION SOCIETY THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT AND OTHERS
Adv. Bajaj Anil S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURAJPRASAD PRALHAD JAISWAL AND ANOTHER Advocate - BONDAR UTTAM BAJIRAO
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Maulana Mohammad Ali Johar Education Society against Surajprasad Pralhad Jaiswal. The court found that the underlying proposal for grant of approval had been resolved by passage of time, rendering the contempt petition moot, and accordingly disposed of the matter without further adjudication on the contempt merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Mar-2020
Petitions For Admission - After Notice [Civil Side Matters]
According To Sitting List
-
27-Nov-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. PatilView PDF
-
27-Nov-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Oct-2018
Case filed
Registration No. CP/822/2018
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition filed by Maulana Mohammad Ali Johar Education Society against Surajprasad Pralhad Jaiswal. The court found that the underlying proposal for grant of approval had been resolved by passage of time, rendering the contempt petition moot, and accordingly disposed of the matter without further adjudication on the contempt merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts