SAYYED ISTAHAQ SAYYED SUJAD ALI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — CP/772/2018

Case under Mah.mun.coun.nagar Pan.& Ind.tow.act 65. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030401512018

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

30th October 2018

Filing Number

CP/31690/2018

Filing Date

12-10-2018

Registration No

CP/772/2018

Registration Date

23-10-2018

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Mah.mun.coun.nagar Pan.& Ind.tow.act 65
Service - Pension
Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

SAYYED ISTAHAQ SAYYED SUJAD ALI

Adv. Talekar S.B.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Adv. ,PATUNKAR SWAPNIL S 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

30-10-2018

URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL

04-03-2020

NOTIFICATION

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the court's earlier contempt order had been complied with. The court accepted this submission and closed the proceedings accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the court's earlier contempt order had been complied with. The court accepted this submission and closed the proceedings accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case