SAYYED ISTAHAQ SAYYED SUJAD ALI vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER — CP/772/2018

Case under Mah.mun.coun.nagar Pan.& Ind.tow.act 65. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Oct-2018

CNR: HCBM030401512018

Filing Number

CP/31690/2018

Filing Date

12-Oct-2018

Registration No

CP/772/2018

Registration Date

23-Oct-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah.mun.coun.nagar Pan.& Ind.tow.act 65
Service - Pension
Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAYYED ISTAHAQ SAYYED SUJAD ALI

    Adv. Talekar S.B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. ,PATUNKAR SWAPNIL S 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the court's earlier contempt order had been complied with. The court accepted this submission and closed the proceedings accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Mar-2020

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  4. 30-Oct-2018

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil K. KotwalView PDF

  5. 30-Oct-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Oct-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/772/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the contempt petition after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the court's earlier contempt order had been complied with. The court accepted this submission and closed the proceedings accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case