ANILKUMAR KISANLAL NAWANDAR Shinde Baliram B. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — CP/619/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030305372022

Filing Number

CP/22669/2022

Filing Date

25-Aug-2022

Registration No

CP/619/2022

Registration Date

16-Sep-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Court Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANILKUMAR KISANLAL NAWANDAR Shinde Baliram B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

    Adv. AGP for R. Nos. 1 to 3.,GADE AKASH D. FOR R. NO. 4. 1123

  2. 2.SUNIL CHAVAN COLLECTOR

  3. 3.APPASAHEB SHINDE

  4. 4.R.A GUJRE THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    Case Summary: CP/619/2022 In this continuation petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), the court ordered that the case be adjourned/stood over to 19.06.2026. The petitioner's counsel placed an affidavit-in-rejoinder on record and undertook to supply copies to contesting respondents. No substantive order on merits was passed at this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Due Admission (Cp)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

  9. 10-Feb-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  10. 27-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

  12. 13-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

  13. 13-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

  14. 13-Oct-2025

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  15. 29-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi,hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-JadhavView PDF

  16. 29-Sep-2025

    For Admission - After Notice

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. B. Suryawanshi , Hon'ble Justice Vaishali Patil-Jadhav

  17. 18-Oct-2022

    Urgent Circulation - CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  18. 03-Oct-2022

    Urgent Circulation - CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Arun R. Pedneker

  19. 19-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 25-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/619/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CP/619/2022 In this continuation petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), the court ordered that the case be adjourned/stood over to 19.06.2026. The petitioner's counsel placed an affidavit-in-rejoinder on record and undertook to supply copies to contesting respondents. No substantive order on merits was passed at this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case