ANILKUMAR KISANLAL NAWANDAR Shinde Baliram B. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS — CP/619/2022
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM030305372022
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
CP/22669/2022
Filing Date
25-08-2022
Registration No
CP/619/2022
Registration Date
16-09-2022
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Category
CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )
Sub-Category
CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANILKUMAR KISANLAL NAWANDAR Shinde Baliram B.
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Adv. AGP for R. Nos. 1 to 3.,GADE AKASH D. FOR R. NO. 4. 1123
SUNIL CHAVAN COLLECTOR
APPASAHEB SHINDE
R.A GUJRE THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL
FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE
DUE ADMISSION (CP)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-09-2022 | URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL |
| 19-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE |
| 04-05-2026 | |
| 17-04-2026 | |
| 27-03-2026 | DUE ADMISSION (CP) |
Orders
Case Summary: CP/619/2022 In this continuation petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), the court ordered that the case be adjourned/stood over to 19.06.2026. The petitioner's counsel placed an affidavit-in-rejoinder on record and undertook to supply copies to contesting respondents. No substantive order on merits was passed at this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CP/619/2022 In this continuation petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench), the court ordered that the case be adjourned/stood over to 19.06.2026. The petitioner's counsel placed an affidavit-in-rejoinder on record and undertook to supply copies to contesting respondents. No substantive order on merits was passed at this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts