VIJAYA BABANRAO KALE AND ANOTHER vs RAHUL DIVEDI AND OTHERS — CP/759/2018
Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030252362018
Next Hearing
23rd October 2018
Filing Number
CP/19853/2018
Filing Date
11-07-2018
Registration No
CP/759/2018
Registration Date
19-10-2018
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIJAYA BABANRAO KALE AND ANOTHER
Adv. Kale Ajeet B.
Respondent(s)
RAHUL DIVEDI AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ABASAHEB D. SHINDE
URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
NOTIFICATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-10-2018 | URGENT CIRCULATION -CIVIL |
| 24-11-2018 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 11-03-2020 | NOTIFICATION |
| 19-01-2023 |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the earlier contempt order had been complied with by the respondents. Although the petitioners were dissatisfied with the amounts paid in compliance, the court granted them liberty to challenge the compliance while disposing of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the earlier contempt order had been complied with by the respondents. Although the petitioners were dissatisfied with the amounts paid in compliance, the court granted them liberty to challenge the compliance while disposing of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts