VIJAYA BABANRAO KALE AND ANOTHER vs RAHUL DIVEDI AND OTHERS — CP/759/2018

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Oct-2018

CNR: HCBM030252362018

Filing Number

CP/19853/2018

Filing Date

11-Jul-2018

Registration No

CP/759/2018

Registration Date

19-Oct-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 - Writ Pet
Contempt of Court Act Section 10,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYA BABANRAO KALE AND ANOTHER

    Adv. Kale Ajeet B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL DIVEDI AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More,hon'ble Shri Justice Abasaheb D. ShindeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the earlier contempt order had been complied with by the respondents. Although the petitioners were dissatisfied with the amounts paid in compliance, the court granted them liberty to challenge the compliance while disposing of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jan-2023

    —

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. Waghwase

  4. 20-Dec-2022

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay S. WaghwaseView PDF

  5. 11-Mar-2020

    Notification

    According To Sitting List

  6. 24-Nov-2018

    Due Admission CIVIL

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil

  7. 23-Oct-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/759/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of the contempt petition after finding that the earlier contempt order had been complied with by the respondents. Although the petitioners were dissatisfied with the amounts paid in compliance, the court granted them liberty to challenge the compliance while disposing of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case