ASHWINI SHRIKANT RAHANE vs SHRIKANT RAMNATH RAHANE — CA/10700/2022

Case under Hindu Marriage Act 1955 Section 9. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM030239732022

Filing Number

CA/17901/2022

Filing Date

07-Jul-2022

Registration No

CA/10700/2022

Registration Date

18-Jul-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Marriage Act 1955 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHWINI SHRIKANT RAHANE

    Adv. Sonawane Sunita G.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRIKANT RAMNATH RAHANE

    Adv. BHIDE VINOD Y. FOR R/SOLE 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    Case Summary: CA/10700/2022 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of two family court appeals between Ashwini Shrikant Rahane (wife) and Shrikant Ramnath Rahane (husband) following successful mediation. The wife had appealed against the Family Court's dismissal of her restitution of conjugal rights petition and the decree granting her husband's marriage annulment petition under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court accepted the parties' amicable settlement, whereby the husband paid ₹8,50,000 to the wife, and both agreed to sever their marital relationship. The court disposed of both appeals in terms of the settlement agreement without adjudicating the underlying disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. Venegavkar

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten S. VenegavkarView PDF

  7. 03-Jul-2023

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  8. 17-Apr-2023

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  9. 17-Mar-2023

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  10. 16-Feb-2023

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar

  11. 19-Jan-2023

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  12. 16-Dec-2022

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  13. 25-Nov-2022

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Y. G. Khobragade

  14. 20-Oct-2022

    For Orders

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Mangesh S. Patil , Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  15. 22-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 07-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CA/10700/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CA/10700/2022 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of two family court appeals between Ashwini Shrikant Rahane (wife) and Shrikant Ramnath Rahane (husband) following successful mediation. The wife had appealed against the Family Court's dismissal of her restitution of conjugal rights petition and the decree granting her husband's marriage annulment petition under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The court accepted the parties' amicable settlement, whereby the husband paid ₹8,50,000 to the wife, and both agreed to sever their marital relationship. The court disposed of both appeals in terms of the settlement agreement without adjudicating the underlying disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case