DHASHRATH KRUSHI SEVA KENDRA THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR DHASHRATH G BACCHEWAR GANESH P SHINDE AND SUYASH M NAYBAL vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ANOTHER — WP/5872/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM030212132026
Filing Number
WP/15384/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/5872/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DHASHRATH KRUSHI SEVA KENDRA THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR DHASHRATH G BACCHEWAR GANESH P SHINDE AND SUYASH M NAYBAL
-
2.DHASHRATH GANESHRAO BACCHEWAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
-
2.THE DISTRICT FERTILISER LICENSING AUTHORITY AND DISTRICT SUPERINTENDING AGRICULTURE OFFICER NANDED
Case History
-
13-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Jul-2026
Petitions For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. Chapalgaonkar
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. ChapalgaonkarView PDF
Summary of WP/5872/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad bench, granted ad-interim relief to Dhashrath Krushi Seva Kendra and other fertilizer dealers whose licenses were suspended twice for the same alleged deficiencies. The court found prima facie merit in petitioners' contention that they were subjected to duplicate punitive action based on a single inspection report dated 11.12.2025—first suspension on 19.12.2025 and again on 26.05.2026—which constituted illegal double jeopardy. Notice was issued returnable on 13.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5872/2026
Summary of WP/5872/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad bench, granted ad-interim relief to Dhashrath Krushi Seva Kendra and other fertilizer dealers whose licenses were suspended twice for the same alleged deficiencies. The court found prima facie merit in petitioners' contention that they were subjected to duplicate punitive action based on a single inspection report dated 11.12.2025—first suspension on 19.12.2025 and again on 26.05.2026—which constituted illegal double jeopardy. Notice was issued returnable on 13.07.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts